"We offered $33 bucks (for Yahoo) and it's $11 today," Ballmer said. "It's clear Yahoo! didn't want to sell. They probably still think it's worth more than $33 a share. I still think it makes sense for their shareholders and ours."
Then, later in the day a Microsoft spokesman said this:
"Our position hasn't changed. Microsoft has no interest in acquiring Yahoo!; there are no discussions between the companies."
It appears that for the moment the Yacrosoft buzz is coming from Steve Ballmer, but has yet to materialize in any substantive negotiations. Still, this could signal the beginning of negotiations for Yahoo!'s depressed stock. The following questions remain:
- Will Yahoo! even sell to Microsoft?
- Will Yahoo! continue to set unrealistic expectations for its share price?
- Will a merger between Microsoft and Yahoo! foster greater competition in the paid search market?
- Will Microsoft be incorporate Yahoo!'s service with its own web offering without causing major damage to both brands in the process?
I have nothing against Microsoft. I think they do a fair job at creating software solutions for the masses--which is by no means an easy task. However, one must realize that the company's image does not fit with Yahoo!'s, and that if Microsoft's image is not harmed by a Yahoo! acquisiton, Yahoo!'s certainly will be.
Perhaps that's the point. As others had point out this spring when a deal looked very likely, maybe Microsoft was toying around with Yahoo! in the hopes of destroying it and taking over a good chunk of its position in search. While I don't think this is the case, the end result might be the same. (However, it's no foregone conclusion that a world without Yahoo! would make Microsoft a lot more powerful in the search market.) While Microsoft is still entertaining the idea of a deal, perhaps Yahoo! will take its eye off the ball and fail to formulate a real long-term strategy to maintain relevant in the online space. With the distraction of Microsoft, as well as huge hits to the ad market, it will be interesting to see how Yahoo! comes out of the current economic funk. On this front I don't have any good predictions, but short of a generous purchase by Microsoft, nothing will come easily.
4 comments:
Yahoo's investors and Yahoo's board are crazy to refuse $33(now $20) a share. Considering the climate, it would be a smart move to take shelter in MSFT's cash horde.
Now that the sound of layoffs are getting louder and louder from Yahoo, their employees might even welcome their new cash hording overlords.
You're right, Yahoo! would be crazy to turn down the cash, which Yogi Berra keenly points out is "just as good as money."
I heard that Yahoo! could axe as many as 3,000 employees to reach their margin targets. One option would be to turn to the cash-hoarding overlords--as you put it--but it's no foregone conclusion that they'll keep all remaining employees on board. There's a lot of overlap between services, infrastructure, and management positions that could make Microsoft take a scalpel to both merging companies.
Microsoft will certainly do well if it acquires Yahoo. Some of the reasons are: A great brand name on the Internet that is well established since the mid 1990s, users like me who are accustomed to doing a Yahoo search in addition to doing searches using Google, MSN, Ask.com and other search engines, and a Web site with popular features like geocities, Yahoo games, and chat. In addition to 275 million Yahoo e-mail users around the world.
Forexthinker, you make a good case for Microsoft's interest in Yahoo! I think Microsoft clearly wants access to those hundreds of millions of registered users to push its own web services--in particular, search. However, the main issue here is the price tag. At what price are the benefits of Yahoo! assets no longer worth it? $20/share? $30/share? Or would you make the case that Microsoft should pay any price that's humanly possible? It's certainly a valid stance if you assume that Yahoo! is MS's only shot at making inroads in the online space.
Post a Comment